MISSILE DEFENCE UPDATE
20 January 2006
In this issue:
Past editions of Missile Defence Update are available at: http://www.basicint.org/update/mdu.htm.
UNITED STATES
US Spending on Missile Defence
During December the US Congress completed work on the
Fiscal-Year 2006 Defense Authorization Bill (H.R. 1815/S. 1042).
$7.8 billion was approved for research, development, testing and
fielding of ballistic missile defence capabilities.
A new report from the US Congressional Budget Office, The
Long-Term Implications of Current Defense Plans and Alternatives:
Detailed Update for Fiscal Year 2006, January 2006, provides an
update of past and projected US missile defence spending. Total US
investment in missile defence is expected to peak in 2013 at about
$15 billion per annum and then decrease, as systems finish with the
procurement phase and become operational. If, however, costs grow
as they have historically, pursuing the programmes included in
CBO's missile defence projection will cost an additional $3 billion
a year, on average, peaking at about $19 billion in 2013.
http://www.cbo.gov/showdoc.cfm?index=7004&sequence=0&from=7
US GMD System: 10th Interceptor in the
Ground and First Operational Launch in More Than a Year
In mid December, the US Missile Defense Agency (MDA) announced
that it's 10th Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD) interceptor had
been placed in its silo at Ft. Greely, Alaska. There are now eight
interceptors in the ground in Alaska, and two at Vandenberg AFB,
California. The interceptors are designed to intercept and destroy
long-range ballistic missiles. Ft. Greely is expected to receive
another interceptor this month, followed by more throughout the
year. However, the MDA have said, "In the interest of operational
security, future interceptor emplacements will not be announced".
(Defense Daily, 21 December 2005).
In late December, the MDA announced its first successful
interceptor launch in more than a year. After two embarrassing
back-to-back test failures in February 2005, MDA Director Lt. Gen.
Trey Obering hailed the test launch from the Marshall Islands in
the Pacific Ocean as a "tremendous success". However, the
interceptor was launched against a simulated target and no actual
intercept was sought. Trials slated for spring 2006 are expected to
include a target missile, and further down the road ("within the
next three years"), a "salvo test" is planned (firing numerous
interceptors against numerous targets simultaneously). (Aviation
Week & Space Technology, 19/26 December 2005).
Back-to-the Future: The High Altitude
Airship
Lockheed Martin plans to build a 400 ft-long airship prototype
that could provide the primary platform for US ballistic and cruise
missile defences or a foreign battlefield. The High Altitude
Airship (HAA) is expected to operate at 65,000 ft or more and will
carry radar, infrared and electro-optical sensors as well as
undisclosed weaponry. The MDA is financing the $149.2 million
design and test flight contract with Lockheed Martin, and the
prototype is expected to fly in 2009. (Aviation Week & Space
Technology, 19/26 December 2005).
MDA Seeking Responsibility for Cruise
Missile Defence
During the annual Association of the US Army space and missile
defense symposium in early December, MDA Director Obering said the
agency is thinking about expanding into the cruise missile arena:
"I have not been asked or assigned [cruise missile defense] yet,
but I believe that the framework is there" to allow MDA to jump
into that mission area. Under the January 2002 memorandum from
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld that set up the MDA, the agency's
focus is limited to ballistic missiles. Currently, the Defense
Department's Joint Theater Air and Missile Defense Office has
responsibility for cruise missile defence programs. Several
speakers at the symposium expressed concern about the US' ability
to defend against a possible cruise missile threat. Navy Admiral
Timothy Keating, the chief of Northern Command, for example, when
asked how the cruise missile threat is being handled, responded:
"not very well, right now. Today . . . we have a very limited
capability to deter a cruise missile attack. Someone [can] pull the
tarp off a 110-foot tramp steamer off the coast of Boston and
shoots an unguided cruise missile into Boston. Can't do much about
it, we want to get better at that". (Inside the Army, 12
December 2005)
Space Weapons
Two articles in the December edition of Arms Control
Today examined the hidden dangers of US plans to develop
space-based defences, especially space-based missile defences. Such
defences are intended to counter the potential threat of an ICBM
attack from a country such as North Korea or Iran, neither of which
has flight-tested even an intermediate-range missile. Hui Zhang
(Action/Reaction: U.S. Space Weaponization and China http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2005_12/Dec-cvr.asp)
points out that US space plans could prompt China to react with
several steps that could in turn endanger US security. Rather than
moving toward space weaponization, he argues that the United States
should sign on to a Russian and Chinese proposal for a treaty
banning the weaponization of space. Ambassador Thomas Graham Jr.
(Space Weapons and the Risk of Accidental Nuclear War http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2005_12/Dec-spaceweapons.asp)
warns that US space weaponization plans may have another hidden
cost: increasing the likelihood of an accidental nuclear exchange
between the United States and Russia, which still retain thousands
of long-range nuclear weapons. He too urges the negotiation of a
treaty banning weapons in outer space.
New Satellite Database
The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) has released the UCS
Satellite Database, a searchable list of over 800 active satellites
with detailed information about them. The database
is free and can be downloaded from the UCS website at:
http://www.ucsusa.org/global_security/space_weapons/satellite_database.html
ISRAEL
Arrow Interceptor Test
On 2 December 2005, Israel successfully tested the Arrow missile
defence system over the Mediterranean. The Arrow interceptor
missile, developed by Israel Aircraft Industries and Boeing, was
launched from Palmachim Air Force Base and successfully intercepted
a Black Sparrow target missile during the terminal phase of its
flight. The Arrow test was a simulated intercept of an incoming
Iranian Shahab-3 ballistic missile. The Arrow system is expected to
operate as the first layer in an Israeli missile defence system.
The aim is to provide enough time for a Patriot interceptor to be
fired as a secondary defense should the high altitude Arrow fail to
intercept an incoming missile. (Ha'aretz, 3 December 2005;
Jane's Defence Weekly, 5 December 2005).
JAPAN
Missile Defence Pact with United States
On 29 October 2005, the United States and Japan signed a new
defence agreement that includes technology transfer for missile
defence. Under the agreement, Japan will deploy an X-band radar
system, which is expected to improve target detection, especially
cruise missiles. The agreement also calls for the US to "deploy
additional complementary capabilities in and around Japan" to
support its missile defence operations. (Aviation Week &
Space Technology, 7 November 2005).
POLAND
Also Keen to Partner the United States?
According to a report in The Guardian (http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,1643499,00.html),
Poland's new centre-right government has signalled its eagerness to
become the key European partner for the Bush administration's
missile defence system. In early November, after winning a vote of
confidence in the Polish parliament, the new prime minister,
Kazimierz Marcinkiewicz, said the Polish authorities were
discussing plans with Washington. "This is an important issue for
Poland, related to our security and to our cooperation with an
important ally," he said. The prime minister told journalists in
Warsaw he wanted a national debate on the plans, which include
potential radar sites and a missile interceptor site in southern
Poland. But Europeans opposed to US national missile defence plans
are likely to be concerned - not least by the fact that
interceptors launched out of Poland would have to overfly other
European countries and that lower stages of the interceptors would
fall there.
Publications
US Military Space Systems: The Road Ahead, Matthew Hoey, Institute for Defense
and Disarmament Studies http://idds.org/25thpapers.html Presentation
at a Symposium on Nonproliferation and Disarmament -The Way Forward,
21-22 October 2005, at MIT.
Click here for a Printer-Friendly
Version.
|