AFGHANISTAN UPDATE
9 August 2007
No. 13: 2 - 8 August 2007
If you would like to receive this update, please email
basic-wash at basicint.org with the phrase "subscribe to Afghanistan
Update" in the subject line. Feedback on format and content is also
gladly received. In particular we are keen to hear feedback of how
useful you find this update. Please contact James Wilson by email
at jwilson at basicint.org with comments or suggestions.
Previous editions of BASIC's Afghanistan Update are available here.
Summary:
- U.S. air strike in Helmand province reportedly wounds 18 civilians;
NATO bomb to cut civilian injuries rarely used
- Bush, Karzai meeting on Afghan security
- Korean hostage rescue attempt not ruled out as Taliban requested
protection for hostage negotiations
- Insurgents suffer losses in south; suicide bombers attack Kandahar
The Daily Telegraph reported that NATO
commanders in Afghanistan have had access to a bomb specifically
designed to limit collateral damage. The bomb has been available
for the past six months but "only 15" have been used in hundreds
of bombing raids. This revelation comes in a week when local officials
claimed that U.S.
airstrikes in Helmand province left at least 18 civilians wounded.
Intelligence reports have suggested that three militant leaders,
including Taliban commander Mullah Rahim, were among those killed
Thursday. The U.S. led coalition is yet to confirm this account.
But a coalition statement said it conducted
a precision airstrike against Taliban commanders in the Baghran
district. The increasing number of non-combatant casualties has
led one senior
British commander to call for the withdrawal of U.S. military Special
Forces from his area of operation in Helmand. The senior British
commander, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said "The phrase
is: 'It may be legal but is it appropriate?' No one is saying it
is illegal to use air power, but is there any other way of doing
it if there is a risk of collateral damage?"
The issue of civilian casualties was one of many major
talking points that heightened political tensions as President
Karzai met with President Bush at Camp David on Sunday and Monday.
President Karzai asserted that Afghanistan security has worsened
and that the United
States and its allies are not any closer to catching Osama bin Laden
than they were a few years ago. Adding to the bleak security backdrop
of the meeting, the Associated Press reported that the United Nations
will release figures in September which will show that Afghan
poppy production has risen 15 percent since 2006. Following
their meeting, however, both Presidents
Karzai and Bush committed to finish their battle against the Taliban.
Karzai claimed the Taliban are
no longer a threat to his government but acknowledged that they
remain a threat to regular civilians. Although President Karzai
seemed to recognize the gravity of the security situation in Afghanistan,
President Bush seemed more optimistic that with "actionable intelligence"
the United States could track down Al-Qaida leaders.
In a visit that was intended to show solidarity in the battle against
the Taliban and Al-Qaida, a rare point of divergence between the
two leaders came over Iran. President
Bush warned his counterpart to be more suspicious, saying the
Islamic Republic was a "destabilizing force" that needed to be isolated
until it abandons nuclear aspirations and becomes a "positive" influence
on the region. Mr. Karzai seemed to disagree in a CNN interview
broadcast Sunday when he characterized Iran as "a helper." Whilst
Iran has sent workers into Afghanistan and provided aid, American
officials contend that Tehran is also responsible for the increased
sophistication of weapons available to insurgents in Afghanistan.
On a related note, Colonel Rahmatullah Safi, head of border police
for western Afghanistan, has led claims that Iranian
weapons are fueling Taliban insurgency efforts in Afghanistan.
Hostage crises continued as the Afghan
government looked to pressure Taliban militants holding 21 South
Koreans following the killing of a second hostage last Monday. The
South Koreans were kidnapped on 19 July in Ghazni province, and
the United
States has not ruled out a possible military operation to free the
hostages. However a resolution to the situation looks further
away than ever. In South Korea the kidnapping situation has provoked
a mixture of anger and sympathy. As the crisis enters its third
week, South
Korean aid missions have come under intense criticism in the
Korean media for their decision to send missionaries to such a volatile
region. Their captor's insistence on the release
of Taliban prisoners is a demand that the Government of President
Karzai is unlikely to meet, particularly following the controversial
release of inmates in March in exchange for an Italian journalist.
Talks between South Korean officials and the Taliban militants
remain ongoing as the Taliban
seek guarantees of safety from the U.N. mission in Afghanistan.
The Taliban militants had claimed earlier this week that some of
the 18 women in the group were seriously ill. Reports suggest that
in response to rebel demands, Afghan
doctors have dropped $1,200 worth of antibiotics, painkillers,
vitamin tablets and heart pills in a desert area in Ghazni province.
Meanwhile the bodies
of four kidnapped judges abducted in July have been discovered
south of Kabul, raising further concerns for the South Korean hostages.
A second engineer and four Afghans also remain missing after their
kidnapping in Wardak Province.
In other news, two civilians have been killed following a suicide
car bomb attack west of Kandahar city Friday. The blast destroyed
three shops and left four others wounded. In another incident, a
group of 75
Taliban militants attempted to overrun a U.S. led coalition base
in Uruzgan province. Direct attacks on U.S. or NATO bases have been
relatively few and the attack left more than 20 militants dead.
James Wilson
BASIC
Stories and Links:
Cameron sees Afghanistan forces, The Guardian, 02/08
http://www.guardian.co.uk/afghanistan/story/0,,2139586,00.html
Taken Hostage, The Times, 02/08
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/leading_article/article2182856.ece
Pakistan urges UK to pull out of Afghanistan, The Daily
Telegraph, 03/08
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/08/03/wafg103.xml
A clash of faiths; Korean Christians and the Taliban, The
Economist, 04/08
http://www.economist.com/world/asia/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9587890&CFID=10265049&CFTOKEN=27166644
10 militants, 4 Pakistani soldiers killed in shootout near Afghan
border, International Herald Tribune, 04/08
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/08/04/asia/AS-GEN-Pakistan-Militant-Attack.php
Afghan doctors deliver medicine for Korean hostages, Reuters,
05/08
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSISL7811420070805?feedType=RSS
Afghan victory 'could take 38 years', The Observer,
05/08
http://www.guardian.co.uk/afghanistan/story/0,,2141924,00.html
British Make Initial Gains Against Taliban, The New York
Times, 05/08
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/05/world/asia/05afghan.html?_r=1&oref=login
Britain presses US on top Afghan role, The Guardian,
06/08
http://www.guardian.co.uk/afghanistan/story/0,,2142480,00.html
Afghan-Pakistani Parley Seeks Unity Against Extremism, The
Washington Post, 08/08
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/07/AR2007080701989.html
Editorials, Transcripts and Reports:
Bolstering the Gains in Afghan Health Care, The Washington
Post, 04/08
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/03/AR2007080301688.html
Running Out of Time, Patience in Afghanistan, The Boston
Globe, 08/08 http://www.boston.com/news/world/asia/articles/2007/08/08/running_out_of_time_patience_in_afghanistan
|