PRESS RELEASE
12
July 2001
U.K.
Lawmakers, Allies Support
Strengthened ABM Treaty
JULY 12 – U.K. parliamentarians
have recently stepped up their pressure on the government of Prime
Minister Tony Blair to reinforce the importance of the ABM Treaty
for nuclear non-proliferation and global stability. Britain has
expressed its concern to the Bush administration about the possible
involvement of U.K. radar sites key to the functioning of upgraded
warning systems, and the potential for Britain becoming a target in
an enemy strike against the United States.
Labour
parliamentarian Malcolm Savidge last month tabled a motion that
"expresses concern at President Bush's intention to move beyond
the constraints of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty in developing
missile defence" and endorses last year’s report from a
parliamentary committee which "questioned whether US plans to
deploy NMD represent an appropriate response to the proliferation
problems faced by the international community." The motion has
gathered the signatures of over 250 members of parliament, of which
197 are members from Blair’s Labour party.
Later this summer, Labour party
officials also are hoping to include language in the final document
from the annual party conference declaring opposition to British
cooperation with U.S. missile defense initiatives. Since the early
June elections, Labour members and union leaders in the U.K. have
amplified their voices against the use of British radar sites at
Fylingdales and Menwith Hill. The United States must receive
permission from the U.K. government before performing the necessary
upgrades to those sites. [For background, see
the Guardian article.]
The latest statements in Britain
showing support for maintaining the ABM Treaty reinforce the recent
concern expressed by U.S. allies over the impact of U.S. efforts to
develop a national missile defense (NMD) system. The unilateral
steps by the Bush administration to advance its NMD plans clearly
fly in the face of international opinion and threaten global
security. Countries worldwide have expressed considerable
disagreement with these initiatives:
· "We have indicated that
the rules-based system of arms control is a very important
characteristic for Canada ... We are urging the United States to
work with Russia to evolve the ABM treaty if it is necessary to
do so. But that they not move unilaterally to abrogate or
violate ABM." (John Manley, Canadian Foreign Minister, 25
June 2001)
· "There is a need to
consolidate and build upon existing disarmament and
non-proliferation agreements, specifically to prevent a new arms
race and to maintain the non-weaponized status of outer
space." (Kofi Annan, United Nations Secretary-General, 1
May 2001)
· "An effective,
treaty-based arms control and disarmament regime must be
preserved and expanded, including effective and verifiable
prevention of proliferation." (Joschka Fischer, German
Foreign Minister, 1 May 2001)
For more
information, please contact:
Mark Bromley in London on +44 (0)20 7407 2977 or
Christine Kucia in Washington on +1 202 347 8340
Back to NMD Home Page
|