PRESS RELEASE
6 July 2000
NMD:
UK Must Decide
Britain’s
Threat Assessment At Odds with US Plans
LONDON
– With the United States on the eve of its third intercept test for a
National Missile Defence system, the UK Government must soon make a choice
on its participation and the future of its Fylingdales radar facility in
Yorkshire. While the outcome of the 7 July test is not certain, it is
nonetheless clear that US plans to move toward deployment are not likely
to be halted by a failure.
Fylingdales
is crucial to a workable US NMD network. Under
current US plans – which, if pursued, would violate the 1972
Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty – the first stage of deployment,
involving up to 100 US interceptors, would require a software upgrade at
the UK facility. Under the next stage of the Pentagon’s public plans,
Fylingdales would be the site for a new, more powerful X-band radar that,
if built, would also violate the ABM treaty. As Russian President
Vladimir Putin said in The Times 12 June, “Washington cannot
realise its plans alone. It needs European help, above all from Britain,
Denmark and Norway. These states risk being drawn into a process that will
lead to an unpredictable destruction of strategic stability. The price
could be very high."
The
UK Government must be clear about its decision, and transparent about what
criteria are used. Obviously, the impact of participation in the US NMD
network on UK security writ large must be a key criterion.
One
question that must be addressed is the fact that UK Defence Ministry
assessments currently find little threat to the UK itself from ballistic
missiles. “We assess that there is no significant threat to the UK from
nuclear weapons at present,” Secretary of State for Defence Geoff Hoon
stated in a House of Commons debate on 5 June, in describing the
Government’s assessment. The British mainland is judged to be secure
from ballistic missile attack, with the possible exception of a highly
unlikely strike by Russia.
In
fact, the UK Strategic Defence Review does not even mention a risk to the
British Isles from weapons of mass destruction, dealing with the subject
rather as a regional problem: “At present, any risk to Britain from the
ballistic missiles of nations of concern in terms of proliferation is many
years off… .”
“The
UK Government must ask itself whether agreeing to link Fylingdales to the
US system actually might undercut its own security. Participation in NMD
raises the spectre that Britain – now relatively safe from missile
attack – could become a direct target,” said BASIC Research Director
Theresa Hitchens.
Another
question that must be addressed is the potential effect of building an
X-band radar facility at Fylingdales, which lies in North Yorkshire
Moors National Park, on the local environment. The Pentagon has
already completed a Draft Environmental Impact Study reviewing the
“potential impacts of deployment and operation of the land-based NMD
system” at the proposed US X-band radar site. This huge study, on page
2-15 of Chapter 2, shows the proposed X-band radar, similar to the one
that could be deployed at Fylingdales, encompassing an area of
approximately 7 hectares (17 acres). The site would require a complex of
security structures, as well as the establishment of an airspace blackout
zone of about 6.7 kilometres (4.2 miles) around the radar unit to protect
pilots from potential electromagnetic interference hazards. Other steps
would be required to prevent local exposure to electromagnetic radiation.
“While
Ministers claim that they cannot make a decision about giving the US
permission to include Fylingdales in the NMD system, the US is pressing
ahead with plans to do just that,” said BASIC Director Dan Plesch.
“Publicly available documents prove that the US is planning to use
Fylingdales for NMD, and here in the UK we are unable to have a proper
debate about it.”
For
more information, please contact:
Dan Plesch and Stuart Samuels on
+44 (0)20 7407 2977 or +44 (0)771-2833909
Back to Nuclear and WMD home page
Back to BASIC Publications home page |