17
JANUARY 2000 • NUMBER 73 • ISSN 0966-9175
OSCE and NATO Take Aim at Small Arms
By Kate Joseph
Transatlantic
multilateral institutions have stepped up efforts to address the
proliferation of small arms, and despite early reservations and
uncertainty among participant states, new initiatives were passed
recently to tackle the challenges associated with their widespread
presence and use. At the November 1999 Organization for Security
and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) Summit in Istanbul, member states
agreed to develop a work plan on small arms, while NATO's
Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council (EAPC), which began focusing its
attention on small arms shortly after the OSCE, adopted in
November its own program for small arms work.
'Flexible'
Decision Draws Praise
The Istanbul Summit marked the first time that the
54-member OSCE included small arms control in its agenda. A year
in the making, Decision 6/99 mandates the Forum for Security
Cooperation (FSC) to draw up an action plan and hold a seminar in
the spring of 2000 on small arms "devoted to the examination
of concrete measures."
In a statement after
the decision passed, Canada and the EU called it "a sound but
flexible basis for our future work." A Canadian official in
Vienna told BASIC Reports that while some countries had been
reluctant to make progress on the issue, "we are satisfied
with the outcome."
States Propose
Further Initiatives
Although the decision was welcomed by most OSCE states,
the final language fell far short of a joint EU-Canada draft,
which advocated an OSCE-wide commitment to several arms reduction
initiatives. The final version called for the OSCE's work to be
"guided by" the need for such measures, including the
reduction of accumulations of small arms; increased restraint in
small arms transfers; efforts to combat illicit weapons
trafficking; and post-conflict collection, safe storage and
destruction of small arms.
The decision's
language also leaves room for differing interpretations of scope
and action. Many of these uncertainties will be cleared up during
the seminar in April 2000. However, a number of countries have
already begun to fill in the blanks with potential ideas for the
OSCE to implement. An official from the Mission of the Netherlands
told BASIC Reports that the Dutch government will propose
activities that draw upon existing arms control regimes. The
official noted that although there is some reluctance on the part
of some Central and Eastern European states, Bulgaria, Romania and
Slovenia have been developing their own initiatives.
Meanwhile, other
governments have been taking a more cautious approach to
initiating discussions in the OSCE. The US Mission said in a
formal statement, "The development of Norm- and
Standard-Setting Measures (NSSMs) strikes us as both a logical and
practical area for discussion in the FSC given our comparative
advantage in this area." NSSMs may include guidelines for
arms exports, for example.
EAPC Program
Stresses Safeguards
Such a cautious approach partly reflects concern of
governments that the OSCE will duplicate the work of the EAPC
ad-hoc working group on small arms, which will develop and
implement practical measures that use NATO's military capacity and
expertise. NATO also has more resources available to spend on a
small arms program.
EAPC's program,
negotiated over several months by all 44 NATO and Partnership for
Peace member states, addresses three areas: stockpile management
and security and surplus weapons destruction; national export
control mechanisms, enforcement and arms embargoes; and
peacekeeping training and development. Within these, some programs
will be classified as "generic training," some will take
the form of "tailored assistance and cooperation," and
others will be "best practice" standards.
NATO will also help
countries destroy weapons that are surplus to national
requirements. Some states, including Kyrgyzstan, Moldova and
Georgia, have already made formal requests for assistance in
destroying weapons, but a Western government official pointed out
that their requests may have more to do with the fact that the
weapons are Russian, and therefore unwelcome.
According to an
official from the US State Department, the program is intended
mainly to help governments from Central and Eastern Europe and the
Commonwealth of Independent States develop and implement better
safeguards on weapons stockpiles. The official emphasized to BASIC
Reports the need to address the lack of safety around weapons
stockpiles in these countries and noted, "Many governments
are unaware that they have a stockpile security problem because
they don't even have a stockpile security program."
In a related
initiative, members of the Balkan Stability Pact signed a
declaration on small arms at the Summit. As yet, Pact members are
unclear on how to implement the measure, which focuses on illicit
transfers, weapons safeguards and post-conflict destruction. While
the declaration will be administered in conjunction with the EAPC,
the OSCE has been invited to monitor weapons destruction.
US, RUSSIA Y2K Monitoring Lays Ground for Shared
Early Warning Measures
By Martin Butcher
Potential
problems resulting from the millennium date rollover spurred the
US and Russia to establish a shared early warning center,
preceding a joint endeavor mandated in a 1997 agreement. However,
despite concern about Russian monitoring capabilities, the two
states maintain their strategic nuclear arsenals at an alert
status comparable to that during the Cold War.
The US-Russian Center
for Y2K Strategic Stability (CY2KSS), based at Peterson Air Force
Base in Colorado from 28 December 1999 until approximately 15
January 2000, "covers for the fact that the agreed joint
early warning center in Moscow has not yet been established,"
according to US Army Major Michael Birmingham, spokesman for the
US Space Command at Peterson. Russia and the US agreed at their
Helsinki Summit in March 1997 to create an early warning center in
Moscow, which will establish systematic cooperation between the
two countries on a permanent basis. Major Birmingham added that,
if necessary and if the Russians agreed, the Center could reopen
to cover another potential rollover problem date, the leap day of
29 February 2000.
Mutual
Confidence Emphasized
The CY2KSS is a measure allowing the US and Russia to
ensure that neither is launching a surprise attack on the other at
a time of heightened sensibilities from possible glitches related
to the millennium date rollover. Major Birmingham told BASIC
Reports that Russian officers staff the Center alongside their US
counterparts, and noted that "the Center is an exercise in
building confidence for Russia" since Russian early warning
systems are dilapidated, unreliable and might not be able to
detect all launches.
In assessing the long
term implications of the CY2KSS for US-Russia relations, Major
Birmingham noted that establishing the Moscow early warning center
sooner than its projected opening in 2001 would be beneficial for
international security. He pointed out that negotiations on
implementation of the Helsinki Summit agreement had been slowed
by, amongst other issues, Russian fears that the US would use the
Center to obtain sensitive data on the gaps in Russian early
warning capabilities. Russia had also broken off contact with the
US in March 1999 on such matters because of the Kosovo war,
although talks resumed during the autumn.
Arsenals
Jointly Monitored for Glitches
The functions of the CY2KSS are essentially the same as
those of the proposed Moscow center. The Y2K Center receives
information from the Cheyenne Mountain Operations Center, and
Major Birmingham stressed that "all data coming into the
Center will be US-provided." Officers in the Y2K Center are
in voice contact with Russian and US military headquarters to
ensure that any glitches, blank screens, or other problems are
dealt with without panic.
In the event of a
warning, the Center determines whether there has actually been a
launch, and if there has, whether the launch is threatening or
harmless. In doing so, it evaluates seven pre-agreed data points,
including location of launch, time of launch, azimuth (direction),
whether a missile or space launch has actually occurred, projected
time and location of impact, and the type of rocket involved. At
the time of writing, the only unexpected launches detected during
the millennium date rollover period were Russian SCUD launches
against Chechnya.
In addition to this
Center, the US has taken steps to work with Russia on the Y2K and
nuclear weapons question. Pete Verga, Deputy Under Secretary of
Defense for Policy Support, told a 16 December 1999 Department of
Defense press briefing that the US has provided technology
assistance to the Russians, special communications links between
the US and Russia, and Y2K verification of existing hotlines.
US Reluctant
to Predict Progress On Disarmament
Despite remarks by John Koskinen, Chair of the
President's Council on Year 2000 Conversion, in several 1999 press
conferences that the world would be safer during the millennium
date rollover if all missiles ceased to function as a result of
Y2K problems, neither US Space Command nor the Pentagon would
comment to BASIC Reports on this suggestion. In addition, Defense
Department officials refused to comment on the decision to cease
the Y2K Center's operation before the Moscow center can be
established.
OSCE Summit Upholds Greater Regional Role
By Jack Seymour
November's
Summit of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe
(OSCE) concluded with support for the potential role of the OSCE
amid mixed signals from states about the level of monetary and
political support they were willing to extend to the 54-member
body.
REACT
Approved; Implementation Soon
Summit leaders agreed to the creation of a US-proposed
Rapid Expert Assistance and Cooperation Team (REACT) and a 24-hour
operation center, which are slated to be operational by 30 June
2000. Both will help the OSCE respond quickly to demands for
civilian field operations, from fact-finding to
conflict-prevention and post-conflict rehabilitation. The US and
other OSCE members are also placing greater emphasis on policing
activities and the agreed-upon centralization of OSCE mission
planning as other concrete measures to help build and sustain
local civilian institutions.
Controversy
Present in Proceedings
The Chechen crisis forced its way onto the Istanbul
agenda and threatened to derail the Summit's goals, including the
signing of the adapted Conventional Forces in Europe (CFE) Treaty
and agreement on a Charter for European Security, according to US
officials who participated. Summit leaders publicly condemned
Russia's military action and the consequent civilian losses in
Chechnya. Russian President Yeltsin left abruptly, but his
departure did not prevent concessions: Russia agreed to a special
mission to Chechnya by the OSCE Chair-in-Office to discuss a
political solution, and all concerned parties signed the CFE
Treaty.
The OSCE Summit did
not change the situation in Chechnya, but it did assert a
"right of review" by the OSCE. A State Department
official, speaking anonymously to BASIC Reports, pointed to the
Charter's language as establishing an important principle and
"opening up a process" for the future. The OSCE
Chairman-in-Office, Norwegian Foreign Minister Kurt Vollebaek,
visited Chechnya in December with Russian approval to offer
"assistance and advice" as allowed by the Charter.
However, his appeal for political dialogue and safe access for
humanitarian assistance has not yet been honored.
Additionally, Russia
agreed to troop reductions and the dismantling of several military
bases in Georgia and Moldova. Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov also
agreed that future deployment of forces into another Commonwealth
of Independent States (CIS) member would now require the approval
of the host country, according to the Summit declaration.
The Istanbul Summit
was the last of 1999's "triple crown" of summits
intended by the United States to emphasize the complementary roles
of NATO, the European Union (EU), and the OSCE as the "three
pillars" of US policy in relations with Europe. According to
State Department officials speaking to BASIC Reports, the Summit
was meant to affirm the organization's place alongside NATO and
the EU as central to US policy toward Europe. Officials said that
although the meeting was "almost derailed" by the crisis
in Chechnya, they were satisfied with the Summit's outcome.
International
Attention Boosts OSCE
Also attending the Summit were UN Secretary General Kofi
Annan, NATO Secretary General Lord Robertson, and EU Commission
President Romano Prodi, which underscored OSCE's increasing role
in European security. The OSCE is also emphasizing its outreach to
other regions, according to officials at OSCE headquarters in
Vienna speaking to BASIC Reports. Accordingly, representatives of
"partnership states" from North Africa and Asia also
attended the meeting in Istanbul.
NEWS BRIEFS
States Deliberate Action on Small Arms
Representatives from
18 countries met in Oslo on 6-7 December 1999 to further
international discussion and understanding on the problems
associated with small arms and light weapons. Leaders in the
global effort to control small arms, including Canada, the
Netherlands, Norway, Japan and Switzerland were joined by
representatives from the Non-Aligned Movement, such as Mexico and
Brazil. Although the US and the UK participated in discussions,
leading arms suppliers including France, Russia and China did not
attend. The December Oslo discussions followed a July 1998
meeting, which opened dialogue and issued a declaration calling
for improved controls of manufacture and transfer of small arms
and increased efforts to combat illicit trafficking (See BASIC
Reports #65).
Although the communiqué‚
from the December 1999 meeting is not yet public, sources told
BASIC Reports that the meeting reviewed progress and further
developed agreements reached during previous discussions. Sources
indicated that while the previous meeting prioritized the need to
control illicit trafficking, greater emphasis was given to
controlling the legal trade in the most recent talks. Although no
concrete initiatives were agreed, delegates singled out arms
brokering as a priority to address, devoting half of their
discussions to the issue.
Sources noted that
only limited progress was made during the meeting. However, one
delegate commented that the Oslo meeting was seen as a "dress
rehearsal," as states explore the issues and discover areas
of consensus before the preparatory meetings for the UN 2001
Conference on illicit trade in all its aspects, which will begin
early next year. - G. O'Callaghan
Gorbachev
Urges International Community
to Part from Cold War Paradigm
Former Soviet
President Mikhail Gorbachev cautioned against using old frameworks
to solve new security problems in his address to a small group of
policy makers and academics at the Woodrow Wilson Center on 7
December 1999. He encouraged all countries to "adapt
international organizations to new times" and recommended
restructuring the UN Security Council. "No G-7 or G-8 or G-22
can solve today's problems. We need a reformed UN Security Council
that can address problems based on equality rather than just the
will of the strong," Gorbachev said. The comments come a
little more than ten years after the fall of the Berlin Wall, an
event in which Gorbachev played a key role. - J. Smith
Commonwealth
Recognizes Small Arms
Proliferation Problem
The Commonwealth Heads
of Government recently acknowledged the "destabilising
accumulation and proliferation of small arms, ammunition, and light
weapons" for the first time ever in its final communiqué‚
from the 12-15 November 1999 meeting held in Durban, South Africa.
The Communiqué‚
highlighted "the intensity and duration of armed conflicts as
well as to international terrorism" caused by small arms, which
in turn affected security, development, and humanitarian initiatives
in member states. The declaration also noted that member states
confronted further difficulties caused by illicit weapons flows, and
called for member governments to "support and encourage the
initiatives underway globally and regionally, and particularly in
the United Nations on this complex problem, including the
international conference scheduled to be held in 2001."
Speaking at a symbolic
destruction of weapons held on the eve of the Commonwealth Summit,
Canadian Foreign Minister Lloyd Axworthy pointed out that the small
arms issue was particularly relevant to this Commonwealth meeting,
which focused on development for people. He noted, "People
can't develop if they're afraid... one of the reasons for fear has
been the tidal wave of small arms that have swept around this
world."
H.E. Chief Emeka Anyaoku,
Commonwealth Secretary General, told BASIC Reports that the
Commonwealth was an effective grouping for promoting consensual
views, and that member states can take any agreement reached on
small arms back to their regions to create a basis for global
consensus. - S. Chin
BASIC Note
BASIC regretfully bids
farewell to Sally Chin and Val Kemball, who departed the London
office in December 1999. We wish them all the best in their future
endeavors.
This edition of BASIC
Reports was edited by
Christine Kucia in Washington.
Back to BASIC
Publications home page
|