Mr. President,
I take the floor today to speak on behalf of
members of the South Pacific Forum group of countries: Australia,
Fiji, the Federated States of Micronesia, the Marshall Islands, Nauru,
New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga and
Vanuatu. Allow me to congratulate you, on behalf of the group, on your
election to office as President of the Review Conference.
Fifty-five years ago the world witnessed the
awesome and unparalleled power of nuclear weapons with the atomic
bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. For the first time in history, man
possessed weapons so lethal that it posed a real threat to all human
life.
The world recognized quickly the disastrous
consequences of nuclear weapons so that as early as 1946, an
international system, called the Baruch Plan, sought to control all
potentially dangerous nuclear activities but was unsuccessful. Thus,
it was not until the NPT's entry into force in 1970 that practical
means were widely accepted to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons
beyond those of the nuclear weapon states.
Since then, the NPT has become a central pillar of
the international system for maintaining peace and security. With 187
States parties it is the most widely supported arms control agreement
ever. The countries of the South Pacific take this opportunity to call
upon states that have not yet acceded to the NPT to do so at an early
date.
While South Pacific countries are geographically
far removed from the contemporary centers of international tension,
all nations, wherever they may be, enjoy security benefits because of
the NPT and have, therefore, major interests in its continued success.
Without the NPT regime, nuclear weapons could have been acquired by
other states and could have undermined our security individually and
collectively. That the disturbing predictions of a world with 25 or
more nuclear weapon states by the 1980s did not come to pass is a
direct consequence of the NPT.
Nuclear Disarmament
The commitment of nuclear weapons states to pursue
nuclear disarmament is a central element of the "bargain" at
the heart of the NPT. South Pacific countries welcome the progress
made towards nuclear disarmament. However there is still much to be
done to realise Article VI of the Treaty. South Pacific countries
welcome the recent decision of the Russian Duma to ratify START II and
look forward to the early conclusion of the ratification process, so
that START III negotiations can commence. We encourage the United
States and Russia to work for the early conclusion of START III. As
all nuclear weapon states have agreed to the determined pursuit of
systematic and progressive efforts to reduce nuclear weapons globally,
we also encourage such states to continue to take steps towards the
goal of the elimination of nuclear weapons.
Nuclear disarmament is an issue of direct and
fundamental interest to all non-nuclear weapon States parties of the
NPT. South Pacific countries encourage the United States and Russia,
and the other nuclear weapon states, to display maximum transparency
on their actual and potential nuclear arms reductions.
Steps Conducive to Further Progress
A strong non-proliferation regime is essential to
further progress towards nuclear disarmament. The Comprehensive
Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) is a key reinforcing element of that
regime. South Pacific countries consider that the CTBT is crucial to
the process of nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament. For the
South Pacific countries the CTBT has a direct and practical benefit.
When the NPT was last reviewed in 1995 the issue of French nuclear
testing in the South Pacific was a matter of great concern. Since then
France has signed and ratified the CTBT and, in 1998, completed the
dismantlement of its South Pacific testing sites on Mururoa and
Fangataufa atolls. While we welcome the moratorium by nuclear weapon
states on nuclear testing which we consider to be consistent with
their signature of the CTBT, we call upon those nuclear weapon states
that must yet ratify the CTBT to do so without delay. We welcome the
recent decision of the Russian Duma to ratify the CTBT and look to all
states to ensure the Treaty's early entry into force. In the meantime
we are proceeding with the establishment of the International
Monitoring System network of stations in the South Pacific region.
The 1995 NPT Review and Extension Conference's
Principles and Objectives identified negotiating a Fissile Material
Cut-off Treaty (FMCT) as vital to fully realising and effectively
implementing Article VI of the NPT. South Pacific countries are
concerned and disappointed that the Conference on Disarmament is yet
to start work on this important agreement. We hope this Conference
will give new impetus for an early start to FMCT negotiations.
South Pacific countries strongly support the
International Atomic Energy Agency's strengthened safeguard system and
consider it crucial that NPT States parties comply fully with their
safeguards obligations. We call on States parties who have not already
done so to conclude the necessary NPT safeguards agreements. We look
forward to fully realizing the non-proliferation benefits of this
system through its universal application.
Nuclear Weapons Free Zones are an important
component of the global arms control regime by complementing the NPT
in limiting the threat posed by nuclear weapons. The South Pacific
Nuclear Free Zone (SPNFZ), established in 1986 by the Treaty of
Rarotonga, is the region's particular contribution to strengthening
the nonproliferation regime and enhancing global security. We welcome
the ratification of the SPNFZ Protocols by certain nuclear weapon
states and we very much hope that the only nuclear weapon state yet to
ratify the Protocols, may, at this Conference, be able to confirm its
commitment to doing so.
Shipment of Radioactive Materials
Shipments of radioactive materials and mixed oxide
(mox) fuel through the region pose a continuing concern for South
Pacific countries taking into account the risks of an accident
occurring and the consequences of such an accident. Such shipments
should be carried out in a manner, which addresses all possible
contingencies and the concerns of relevant countries, including
coastal-states, of the region. South Pacific countries expect that
shipments would be made only if the cargo was of demonstrably minimal
risk, on ships that are of the highest standards and by shipping
states that agree to promote the safety of the material and, in the
event of an accident, provide compensation for any industries harmed
as a result of changes in the market value of the region's fisheries
and tourism products.
South Pacific countries note the constructive
dialogue with nuclear industry representatives from France, Japan and
the United Kingdom on the current liability and compensation regime
for shipments of radioactive materials and mox fuel through the
region. We affirm our readiness to engage again, at an early point,
and to continue to explore possible new and innovative arrangements
that could address the inadequacies of the current regime. South
Pacific countries underline also the importance of international
efforts in the IMO and IAEA to pursue a strong regime of prior
notification to, and consultation with, coastal states on planned
shipments of radioactive materials and mox fuel (consistent with
security requirements), and the development of a regime for the
preparation of Environmental Impact Statements and Emergency Response
Plans.
Conclusion
The countries of the South Pacific recognize that
the NPT serves our interests well in preventing nuclear proliferation.
It remains the only treaty in which nuclear weapon states have
committed themselves to the goal of the eliminating nuclear weapons.
In order to achieve non-proliferation and disarmament goals the NPT
remains of irreducible importance.
The Treaty has achieved much over its thirty years.
Yet much more remains to be done. Fully achieving the NPT goals
requires determined effort and demonstrated commitment by all parties
to the Treaty. The countries of the South Pacific are so committed,
ready to make that effort individually and collectively in order to
ensure the Forgoing strength of this cornerstone of the international
nuclear nonproliferation and disarmament regime.