The 2000 NPT Review
Conference (RevCon)
|
|
NPT/CONF.2000/9 |
Activities of the IAEA relevant to article III of the NPT: Background paper prepared by the Secretariat of the IAEA |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/10 |
Activities of the IAEA relevant to article IV of the NPT: Background paper prepared by the Secretariat of the IAEA |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/11 |
Activities of the IAEA relevant to article V of the NPT: Background paper prepared by the Secretariat of the IAEA |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/17 |
Working paper submitted by Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, the Republic of Korea, Romania, Russian Federation, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States as members of the Zangger Committee |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/18 |
Letter dated 20 April 2000 from the Permanent Representative of Indonesia addressed to the Provisional Secretary-General of the Review Conference |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/19 |
Letter dated 25 April 2000 from the Permanent Mission of Portugal to the United Nations addressed to the Secretariat of the 2000 Review Conference |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/21 |
Letter dated 1 May 2000 from the representatives of France, the People's Republic of China, the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America addressed to the President of the 2000 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/WP.1 |
Working paper submitted by Japan and Australia |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/WP.3 |
Letter dated 24 April 2000 from the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Mexico addressed to the Secretary-General of the Review Conference |
(b) Documents submitted to the Committee
|
NPT/CONF.2000/MC.III/WP.1 |
Working paper submitted by Australia, Austria, Canada, Denmark, Hungary, Ireland, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway and Sweden |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/MC.III/WP.2 |
Working paper submitted by Australia, Austria, Canada, Denmark, Hungary, Ireland, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway and Sweden |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/MC.III/WP.3 |
Working paper submitted by China |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/MC.III/WP.4 |
Working paper submitted by South Africa |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/MC.III/WP.5 |
Working paper submitted by Egypt |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/MC.III/WP.6 |
Working paper submitted by Mexico |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/MC.III/WP.7 |
Working paper submitted by Australia, Austria, the Netherlands, Lithuania and Luxembourg |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/MC.III/WP.8 |
Working paper submitted by Portugal on behalf of the EU |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/MC.III/WP.9 |
Working paper submitted by the Russian Federation |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/MC.III/WP.10 |
Working paper submitted by the Islamic Republic of Iran |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/MC.III/WP.11 |
Working paper submitted by Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/MC.III/WP.12 |
Working paper submitted by Egypt |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/MC.III/CRP.1 and Rev.1 |
Chairman's suggested indicative timetable of work for Main Committee III |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/MC.III/CRP.2 |
Chairman's proposal for a possible structure of discussion |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/MC.III/CRP.3 and Add.1 |
The IAEA's technology transfer activities in respect of Technical Co‑operation |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/MC.III/CRP.4 |
Proposal by New Zealand, Fiji, Ireland, Turkey, Nauru, Solomon Islands and the Federated States of Micronesia |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/MC.III/CRP.5 |
Proposal by Germany |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/MC.III/CRP.6 |
Proposal by Germany |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/MC.III/CRP.7 |
Proposal by China, Indonesia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Malaysia, Myanmar, Peru, Syrian Arab Republic and Thailand |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/MC.III/CRP.8 |
Proposal by the members if the Non-Aligned Counties, parties to the Treaty on the NonProliferation of Nuclear Weapons |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/MC.III/CRP.9 |
Proposal by the States parties, members of the Caribbean Community: Antigua and Barbuda, the Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Dominica, Grenada, Guyana, Haiti, Jamaica, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/MC.III/CRP.10 |
Paper submitted by Australia: Australia's Commitment to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/MC.III/CRP.11 |
Proposal by the Russian Federation |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/MC.III/CRP.12 |
Proposal by Japan |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/MC.III/CRP.13 |
Proposal by Germany |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/MC.III/CRP.14 |
Proposal by Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine |
|
NPT/CONF.2000/MC.III/CRP.15 |
Draft Report of Main Committee III and Rev.1, Rev.2 |
Work of the Committee
4.
The Committee held four plenary meetings, from 27 April to 11 May
2000. An account of the discussion is contained in the relevant
summary records (NPT/CONF.2000/MC.III/SR1-4). At its first three
meetings, it held a general exchange of views on all issues of concern
to Main Committee III. At its second meeting, a presentation was made
by Mr. Paulo Barretto, Department of Technical Cooperation of the IAEA,
on the IAEA's technology transfer activities. After that, the
Committee held nine informal open-ended meetings for the presentation
and detailed consideration of those proposals and documents submitted
to it on formulations for the Final Declaration of the Conference. The
Chairman put forward draft language for the Final Declaration, which
was considered in the open-ended meetings. The fourth meeting was
devoted to the consideration and adoption of its report to the
Conference.
Conclusions and recommendations
5. At its final meeting, the Committee agreed to transmit to the Conference the following formulations for the Final Declaration of the Conference:
I. TREATY ON THE NON-PROLIFERATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND THE PEACEFUL USES OF NUCLEAR ENERGY
1. The Conference affirms that the Treaty fosters the development of the peaceful uses of nuclear energy by providing a framework of confidence and co-operation within which those uses can take place.
2. The Conference reaffirms that nothing in the Treaty shall be interpreted as affecting the inalienable right of all the parties to the Treaty to develop research, production and use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes without discrimination and in conformity with articles I, II and III of the Treaty. The Conference recognizes that this right constitutes one of the fundamental objectives of the Treaty. In this connection, the Conference confirms that each country's choices and decisions in the field of peaceful uses of nuclear energy should be respected without jeopardizing its policies or international co-operation agreements and arrangements for peaceful uses of nuclear energy and its fuel-cycle policies.
3. The Conference also reaffirms the undertaking by all parties to the Treaty to facilitate and have the right to participate in, the fullest possible exchange of equipment, material and scientific and technological information for the peaceful uses of nuclear energy among States parties to the Treaty. The Conference notes the contribution that such uses can make to progress in general and to help to overcome the technological and economic disparities between developed and developing countries.
4. The Conference urges that in all activities designed to promote the peaceful uses of nuclear energy, preferential treatment be given to the Non-Nuclear-Weapon States parties to the Treaty, taking the needs of developing countries particularly into account.
5. Referring to paragraphs 14 - 20 of the Principles and Objectives decision of 1995, the Conference reasserts the need to continue to enhance the peaceful uses of nuclear energy by all States parties and co‑operation among them.
6. The Conference underlines the role of the IAEA in assisting developing countries in the peaceful use of nuclear energy through the development of effective programmes aimed at improving their scientific, technological, and regulatory capabilities. In this context, the Conference takes note of the medium-term strategy of the IAEA.
7. The Conference affirms that every effort should be made to ensure that the IAEA has the financial and human resources necessary in order to meet effectively its responsibilities as foreseen in Article III.A of the Statute of the IAEA.
8. The Conference endorses the request by the IAEA General Conference to the Director General to help interested Member States to obtain access to relevant information the role of nuclear power in achieving sustainable development in developing countries and in mitigating greenhouse gas emissions through the Clean Development Mechanism as may be elaborated under the Kyoto Protocol, and to assist in implementing national case studies as well as preparation of potential projects.
9. The Conference recognizes the importance of safety and non-proliferation features, as well as aspects related to radioactive waste management being addressed in nuclear power development as well as other nuclear activities related to the nuclear fuel cycle at the technological level. The Conference recalls the role of the IAEA in the assessment of prospective nuclear power technologies in this respect.
10. The Conference commends the IAEA for its efforts to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of the Agency's Technical Co-operation Programme and to ensure the continuing relevance of the programme to the changing circumstances and needs of recipient Member States. In this context, the Conference welcomes the new strategy for Technical Co-operation, which seeks to promote socio-economic impact within its core competencies, by integrating its assistance into the national development programme of each country with a view to ensure sustainability through expanding partnerships in development, model project standards and use of country programme frameworks and thematic plans. The Conference recommends that the IAEA continue taking this objective and the needs of developing countries, notably least-developed countries, into account when planning its future activities.
11. The Conference acknowledges the need for the parties to the Treaty to discuss regularly and take specific steps towards the implementation of article IV of the Treaty.
II. NUCLEAR AND RADIATION SAFETY, SAFE TRANSPORT OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS, RADIOACTIVE WASTE AND LIABILITY
A. Nuclear and Radiation Safety
1. The Conference affirms that the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons can help to ensure that international co-operation in nuclear and radiation safety will take place within an appropriate non-proliferation framework. The Conference acknowledges the primary responsibility of individual States for maintaining the safety of nuclear installations within their territories, or under their jurisdiction, and the crucial importance of an adequate national technical, human and regulatory infrastructure in nuclear safety, radiological protection and radioactive waste management.
2. The Conference notes that a demonstrated global record of safety is a key element for the peaceful uses of nuclear energy and that continuous efforts are required to ensure that the technical and human requirements of safety are maintained at the optimal level. Although safety is a national responsibility, international co-operation on all safety-related matters is indispensable. The Conference encourages the efforts of the IAEA in the promotion of safety in all its aspects, and encourages all States parties to take the appropriate national, regional and international steps to enhance and foster a safety culture. The Conference welcomes and underlines the intensification of national measures and international co-operation in order to strengthen nuclear safety, radiation protection, the safe transport of radioactive materials and radioactive waste management, including activities conducted in this area by the IAEA. In this regard, the Conference recalls that special efforts should be made and sustained to increase the awareness in these fields, through appropriate training.
3. The Conference welcomes the activities of the IAEA directed towards the strengthening of nuclear safety in operating power and research reactors. The Conference further endorses the work of the IAEA in the organization of international peer review services, the support to the regulatory bodies and other relevant areas of the infrastructure of Member States through the Technical Co-operation Programme, the safety standards advisory commission and committees in the preparation of internationally recognized safety standards, the emergency response unit and the continuing work on transport safety matters.
4. The Conference welcomes the entry into force of the Convention on Nuclear Safety, and encourages all States, particularly those operating, constructing or planning nuclear power reactors, which have not yet taken the necessary steps to become party to the Convention, to do so. It would also welcome a voluntary application of the related provisions of the Convention, to other relevant nuclear installations dedicated to the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. The Conference also expresses its satisfaction with the outcome of the first review meeting under the Convention on Nuclear Safety, and looks forward to the report from the next review meeting, particularly with respect to those areas where the first review meeting found that there was room for safety improvements.
5. The Conference encourages all States that have not yet done so to become parties to the Convention on Early Notification of a Nuclear Accident, the Convention on Assistance in the Case of a Nuclear Accident or Radiological Emergency, and the Convention on Physical Protection of Nuclear Material.
6. The Conference notes the bilateral and multilateral activities that have enhanced the capabilities of the international community to study, minimize and mitigate the consequences of the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in support of the actions taken by the governments concerned.
7. The Conference considers that attacks or threats of attack on nuclear facilities devoted to peaceful purposes, jeopardize nuclear safety and have dangerous political, economic and environmental implications, and raise serious concerns regarding the application of international law on the use of force in such cases which could warrant appropriate action in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations.
8.
The Conference notes the importance of openness, transparency and public
information concerning the safety of nuclear facilities.
B. Safe Transport of Radioactive Materials
9. The Conference underlines the importance of effective national and international regulations and standards for the protection of States concerned, from the risks of transportation of radioactive materials. The Conference affirms it is in the interest of all States that any transportation of radioactive material, in particular irradiated nuclear fuel, plutonium and high-level radioactive waste, be conducted in compliance with the relevant standards of the IAEA and IMO, in accordance with the rights and obligations provided for in international law such as maritime, river and air navigation rights and freedom. The Conference takes note of the concerns of small island developing States and other coastal States with regard to the transportation of radioactive materials by sea.
10. The Conference endorses the IAEA regulations for the safe transport of radioactive materials and urges States to ensure that these standards are maintained. The Conference notes the decision in 1997 by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) to incorporate the Code for the Safe Carriage of Irradiated Nuclear Fuel, Plutonium and High-Level Radioactive Wastes in Flasks on Board Ships (INF Code) into the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea.
11. Recalling resolution GC(43)/Res/11 of the IAEA General Conference adopted by consensus in 1999, the Conference invites States shipping radioactive materials to provide as appropriate, assurances to concerned States upon their request that the national regulations of the shipping State take into account the IAEA's transport regulations and to provide them with relevant information relating to shipments of such materials. The information provided should in no case be contradictory to the measures of physical security and safety.
12.
The
Conference notes that States parties have been working bilaterally and
through international organizations, to improve co-operation and
exchange of information among the States concerned. In this context, the
Conference calls on States parties to continue working bilaterally and
through the relevant international organizations to examine and further
improve measures and international regulations relevant to international
maritime transportation of radioactive material and spent fuel.
C. Spent Fuel and Radioactive Waste
13. The Conference notes that a major issue in the debate over the use of nuclear technologies is the safety of the management of spent fuel and of radioactive waste. The Conference notes the conclusion of the Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management, and encourages States that have not yet taken the necessary steps to become party to the Convention, to do so. The Conference expresses the hope that this Convention will enter into force at the earliest date possible. The Conference underlines the importance that spent fuel and radioactive waste excluded from this Convention because they are within military or defence programmer, be managed in accordance with the objectives stated in this Convention.
14. The Conference commends the efforts of IAEA in radioactive waste management, and calls upon the IAEA, in view of the increasing importance of all aspects of radioactive waste management, to strengthen its efforts in this field as resources permit. The Conference recognizes the activities of the IAEA in the search for new approaches on radioactive waste management solutions that are both safe and publicly acceptable. It endorses the IAEA programmes to assist Member States in spent fuel and radioactive waste management through, inter alia, safety standards, peer reviews and Technical Co-operation activities.
15. The Conference also notes that the Contracting Parties to the Convention on the Prevention of Maritime Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter (London Convention) have urged all States that have not done so, to accept the 1993 amendment of Annex I of the London Convention which prohibits Contracting Parties from dumping radioactive wastes or other radioactive matter at sea.
D. Liability
16. The Conference notes that effective international liability mechanisms are essential to provide compensation to third parry victims for any nuclear-related damage that may result from ionizing radiation emitted from inside a nuclear installation or emitted from nuclear fuel or radioactive products or waste, in, or of nuclear material coming from, originating in or sent to a nuclear installation. The Conference notes the existence of various national and international liability mechanisms. The Conference notes the adoption of the 1997 Protocol to Amend the 1963 Vienna Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage and the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage. The Conference urges [-] States, nationally or in co-operation with others to ensure that they have efficient liability mechanisms in place.
III. TECHNICAL CO-OPERATION
1. The Conference reaffirms the undertaking of those parties to the Treaty in a position to do so to co-operate in contributing alone or together with other States or international organizations to the further development of the applications of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, especially in the territories of Non-Nuclear-Weapon States parties to the Treaty, with due consideration for the needs of the developing areas of the world.
2. The Conference recognizes the benefits of the peaceful applications of nuclear energy and nuclear techniques in the fields referred to in Article III.A.2 of the Statute of the IAEA, inter alia, food and agriculture, human health, environment, water resources management, research and industry, and their contribution to achieving sustainable development in developing countries and for generally improving the well being and the quality of life of the peoples of the world.
3. The Conference acknowledges the importance of the work of IAEA as the principal agent for technology transfer among the international organizations referred to in Article IV, paragraph 2 of the Treaty and affirms the importance of the Technical Co-operation activities of the IAEA, as well as bilateral and other multilateral co-operation, in fulfilling the obligations set forth in Article IV of the Treaty.
4. The Conference recognizes that voluntary resources provided to and received from States parties to the Treaty under the IAEA's Technical Co-operation Fund represent the most important contribution to the implementation of its Technical Co-operation Programme, the major instrument for its co-operation with developing countries. The Conference expresses its appreciation to all IAEA Member States party to the Treaty, which respect their commitments to the Technical Co-operation Fund, by pledging and paying in full their contributions.
5. The Conference, however, notes that there has been a growing gap between the approved target figures for the Technical Co-operation Fund and the actual payments.
6. The Conference stresses that every effort should be made to ensure that the IAEA's financial and human resources necessary for Technical Co-operation activities are assured, predictable, and sufficient to meet the objectives mandated in Article IV, paragraph 2 of the Treaty and Article II of the IAEA Statute. It urges Member States of the IAEA to make every effort to pay in full and on time their voluntary contributions to the Technical Cooperation Fund and reminds them of their obligation to pay their Assessed Programme Costs. It also encourages the IAEA to continue to manage its Technical Co-operation activities in an effective and cost-efficient manner.
7. The Conference notes that the special needs and priorities of the least developed countries parties to the Treaty should be take into account in bilateral and multilateral nuclear technical assistance and co-operation programmer. The Conference recommends that the IAEA continue, through its Technical Co-operation Programme, to give special attention to the needs and priorities of least developed countries.
8. The Conference recognizes that regional co-operative arrangements for the promotion of the peaceful use of nuclear energy, can be an effective means of providing assistance and facilitating technology transfer, complementing the Technical Co-operation activities of IAEA in individual countries. It notes the contributions of the African Regional Agreement (AFRA), the Regional Co-operation Agreement for Latin America (ARCAL), the Regional Co-operation Agreement for Asia and the Pacific (RCA), as well as the regional Technical Co-operation Programme in Central and Eastern Europe.
9. The Conference notes the significant level of bilateral co-operation between States parties in the worldwide peaceful uses of nuclear energy and welcomes the reports thereon. The Conference recognizes that it is the responsibility of States parties to create the conditions to enable this co-operation, in which commercial entities play an important role in a manner that conforms with the States parties' obligations under Articles I and II of the Treaty. The Conference urges States in a position to do so to continue and where possible increase their co-operation in this field, particularly to developing countries and parties to the Treaty with economies in transition.
10. The Conference calls upon all States parties in acting in pursuance of the objectives of the Treaty to observe the legitimate rights of all States parties, particularly developing States, to have full access to nuclear material, equipment and technological information for peaceful purposes. Transfers of nuclear technology and international co-operation in conformity with articles I, II and III of the Treaty are to be encouraged. They would be facilitated by eliminating undue constraints that might impede such co-operation.
11.
The
Conference affirms that transparency in nuclear-related export controls
should be maintained and enhanced within the framework of dialogue and
co-operation among all interested States party to the Treaty. The
Conference takes note of the activities of the Zangger Committee and the
Nuclear Suppliers Group in this respect, and encourages the continuation
of such dialogue and co-operation.
IV. CONVERSION OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS TO PEACEFUL USES
1. The Conference welcomes steps taken by several States parties to dismantle and destroy thousands of nuclear weapons and to transfer irreversibly, nuclear material formerly produced for military purposes to use in peaceful activities. This represents an important precedent for linking progress in nuclear disarmament with peaceful uses of nuclear energy. This disarmament process requires strict procedures for the safe handling, storage and disposal of sensitive nuclear materials, as well as looking toward the safe management of radioactive contaminants in strict compliance with high standards of environmental protection and nuclear and radiation safety.
2. The Conference takes note of the Declaration of the Moscow Nuclear Safety and Security Summit of April 1996, including in relation to the safe and effective management of weapons fissile material designated as no longer required for defence purposes, and the initiatives stemming from it.
3. The Conference also notes that there have been exceptional instances in which serious environmental consequences have resulted from uranium mining and associated nuclear fuel-cycle activities in the production of nuclear weapons.
4. The Conference calls upon all Governments and international organizations that have expertise in the field of cleanup and disposal of radioactive contaminants to consider giving appropriate assistance as may be requested for radiological assessment and remedial purposes in these affected areas, while noting the efforts that have been made to date in this regard.
V. REVIEW OF ARTICLE V
The Conference affirms that the provisions of Article V of the Treaty as regards the peaceful applications of any nuclear explosions are to be interpreted in the light of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty.
VI. REVIEW OF ARTICLE IX
1. The Conference reaffirms the long-held commitment of parties to the Treaty to universal membership and notes that this goal has been advanced by the accession to the Treaty of several new States since the 1995 Review and Extension Conference, thereby bringing its membership to 187 States parties. The Conference reaffirms the importance of the Treaty in establishing a norm of international behaviour in the nuclear field.
2. The Conference therefore calls on those remaining States not parties to the Treaty to accede to it, thereby accepting an international legally binding commitment not to acquire nuclear weapons or nuclear explosive devices and to accept IAEA safeguards on all their nuclear activities. These States are Cuba, India, Israel, and Pakistan. In this context the Conference welcomes the signature by Cuba, of the Protocol additional to its safeguards agreements with the IAEA.
3. The Conference particularly urges those non-parties to the Treaty which operate unsafeguarded nuclear facilities - India, Israel and Pakistan- to take similar action and affirms the important contribution this would make to regional and global security.
4. The Conference also takes note that the widening of the entry into force of Protocols additional to Safeguards agreements with the IAEA, will strengthen the nuclear safeguards regime, and will facilitate the exchange of nuclear and nuclear-related material in peaceful nuclear cooperation.
5. In this connection, the Conference underlines the necessity of universal adherence to the Treaty and of strict compliance by all existing parties with their obligations under the Treaty.
6. The Conference requests the President of the Conference to convey formally the views of States parties on this issue to all non-parties and to report their responses to the parties. Such efforts should contribute to enhancing the universality of the Treaty and the adherence of non-parties to it.