Malaysia

Permanent Mission to the United Nations

Address: 313 East d 3rd Street New York, NY 10017 7

Tel: 21 986- 6310

Fax: 212- 490- 8576



STATEMENT BY

MR. AHMAD JAZRI MOHD JOHAR

REPRESENTATIVE OF MALAYSIA TO THE PREPARATORY

COMMITTEE FOR THE 2000 REVIEW CONFERENCE

OF THE STATES PARTIES TO THE TREATY ON

THE NON-PROLIFERATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS

TUESDAY, 8 APRIL 1997



Mr. Chairman,

         

     On behalf of the Malaysian Delegation, allow me  to extend

     to you our warm congratulations on your assumption of the

     chairmanship  of the first session of the Preparatory

     Committee for the 2000 Review Conference of the Parties

     to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.

     We are confident given your vast experience you will be

     able to steer the work of this Committee towards a

     successful outcome for the preparatory process for the 2000

     NPT Review Conference.



2.   My delegation would like to underline the importance of

     this session of the Preparatory Committee as it will

     obviously set a tone for future sessions and the Review

     Conference itself. This session offers a unique opportunity

     for the States Parties to the NPT to advance the cause of

     global nuclear disarmament',



Mr. Chairman,



3.   As we embark on the beginning for another review process

     of the NPT, we certainly look forward for further

     breakthroughs in our- efforts to strengthen nuclear

     disarmament and non-proliferation regimes. However, al

     new beginning does not start from nothing. In this regard,

     we must also take stock of the performance of all NPT

     States Parties in fulfilling their obligations as set out in tie

     Preamble and Article VI of the Treaty. At the same time,

     we must take into account the commitments and

     responsibilities undertaken by the States Parties during the

     1995 NPT Review and Extension Conference, and ask

     ourself how much have those commitments and

     responsibilities been carried out. Based on this premise, my

     delegation fully supports those who have echoed the need

     for this session of the Preparatory Committee to make

     substantive progress in the coming days.



4.   The Malaysian delegation has placed confidence in the

     NPT, albeit its apparent weaknesses. as a global instrument

     to check nuclear proliferation both horizontally as well as

     vertically. Like any other non-nuclear weapon States

     Parties to this Treaty, we bad foresworn in good faith any

     intention to develop and produce nuclear weapons.

     Together with other South East Asian countries we have

     negotiated and concluded a treaty which would prohibit the

     stationing of nuclear weapons in any form in the territories

     of South East Asia. As widely known, similar nuclear

     weapon free zones have been established in the South

     Pacific, Africa, Antarctica, Latin America and the

     Caribbean We would certainly welcome efforts to establish

     further such zones in other parts of the world.



5.   While nuclear weapon free zones are important as a means

     to check nuclear proliferation, they cannot substitute for the

     primary goal that is, the global elimination of nuclear

     weapons. While these weapons exist anywhere, they

     threaten the security of the entire world. On this point, my

     delegation welcome the recent statement 61  retired

     generals and admirals that the continuing existence of

     nuclear weapons creates  insecurity nor security.

     Furthermore, total elimination of nuclear weapons is the

     only  Insurance bond. and guarantee against the threat of

     them being used in the future.



6.   We acknowledge the important breakthroughs in the

     nuclear disarmament  negotiations involving all or some of

     the nuclear weapon states. We arc encouraged by  the

     on-going efforts in the direction of nuclear arms reduction,

     such as the recent  announcement made in Helsinki by

     President Clinton and President Yeltsin that the  United

     States and the Russian Federation plan to reduce their

     nuclear stockpile.  However, we regret that these pledges

     do not go far enough and certainly fall far short  of the

     expectation of non-nuclear weapon states. The nuclear

     weapon states have set  no timeframe for the complete

     elimination of their nuclear arsenals, and will not, as  they

     have made clear, enter into negotiations on such an

     objective.



Mr. Chairman,



7.   My delegation also hopes that the NPT review process will

     also seriously consider  the efforts that could be made to

     bring those few countries that remain outside of the  Treaty

     into the NPT regime so as to realise its much-desired

     universality. My  delegation warmly welcomes the

     adherence of eight more states to the Treaty as you  noted

     in your opening remarks yesterday. In this regard, my

     delegation wishes to  underscore she special role of the

     nuclear weapon states vis-a-vis the NPT as the  fulfillment

     of their part of the "bargain" would be a critical factor in

     bringing about the  universality of the Treaty. This includes

     the fulfillment of their commitments and  obligations on

     inter-alia the questions of security assurances, fissile

     material cut-off,  and timetable for complete nuclear

     disarmament.



Mr. Chairman



8.   During the 51st session of the UN General Assembly

     Malaysia introduced, on  behalf of the co-sponsors, a

     Resolution pertaining to the advisory opinion of the 

     International Court of Justice issued on 8 July 1996 on the

     legality of the use or threat  of use of nuclear weapons. The

     adoption of Resolution A51/45M by a large majority  of

     non-nuclear weapon states was testimony to the serious

     concern, indeed frustration,  of the international community

     over the lack of genuine seriousness and the extremely 

     slow pace in negotiations on nuclear disarmament leading

     to the ultimate elimination  of nuclear weapons. The

     Resolution reinforced the unanimous opinion of the World 

     Court which stressed that States Parties to the NPT have

     legal obligation not only to  pursue "negotiation leading to

     nuclear disarmament in all its aspects", in accordance  with

     Article VI of the NPT, but also to "bring to a conclusion

     such negotiations.



9.   Resolution 51/45M also called upon all states to

     immediately by commencing multilateral negotiations in

     1997 leading to an early nuclear weapon convention

     prohibiting the development, production, testing,

     deployment, stockpiling, transfer, threat or use of nuclear

     weapons and providing for their elimination We are

     heartened to be joined in the call for such negotiations by

     the European Parliament in their resolution of March 13,

     1997 which welcomed Resolution 51/45M and which calls

     for all states to support such negotiations. This is an

     unambiguous message for all states parties to the NPT, in

     particular for the nuclear weapon states.



Mr. Chairman,



10.  My delegation looks forward to a fruitful discussion ahead

     of us, and we will endeavor to contribute in e discussion in

     this Preparatory Committee.



I thank you, Mr. Chairman.