ACRONYM NPT Update No. 2

A service during the 1995 NPT Review and Extension Conference of the ACRONYM Consortium and Disarmament Times

The Conference Opens

18 April 1995

Despite continued disagreement on whether the extension vote should be taken by secret ballot or open roll call, the 1995 Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) opened on time on April 17, at the United Nations in New York. Ambassador Pasi Patokallio of Finland, Chair of the fourth PrepCom, presided over the unanimous election of Ambassador Jayantha Dhanapala of Sri Lanka as President of the Conference. The opening session was addressed by Dhanapala, US Secretary of State Warren Christopher, representatives from each of the groupings (the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), Western Group and Eastern Europeans), UN Secretary General Boutros Boutros Ghali and Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Hans Blix. To pave the way for starting work in earnest, the Conference provisionally adopted its rules of procedure, following which it adopted the agenda and elected its officers, as agreed at the fourth PrepCom.

Rules provisionally adopted without agreement on ballot

Since there was still disagreement over rule 28 (3) on the extension decision, the Conference provisionally adopted the rules of procedure, with the exception of rule 28 (3). Russia wanted to prevent the rules being adopted until all had been agreed, but was persuaded to accept this compromise in order to allow the Conference to begin work. Dhanapala, as President, will oversee continuing negotiations to try to reach agreement no later than 10.00 am Wednesday 26 April. The only outstanding issue now is whether the ballot should be secret or open. Most of the non-aligned states argue that a secret ballot would be more 'fair' and less subject to 'strong-arm tactics', while delegates from the other states argue that the vote must be open, recorded and accountable. The deadlock is in part due to resentment from several non- aligned states over the pressure applied by the US and others and the linking of aid and trade support with votes for indefinite extension.

Compromise from Western delegates enabled agreement to be reached on eliminating the proposal with fewest votes after the first ballot and on when voting will begin on the extension proposals if consensus is not achieved. Proposals will have to be submitted by 1800 hours Monday May 8, with voting beginning on May 10 if no consensus has been reached.

Election of officers

The following appointments were made:

Secretary General of the Conference: Prvoslav Davinic;
Main Committee I (disarmament): Chair Isaac Ayewah of Nigeria; Vice Chairs: Richard Starr of Australia and representative of Ukraine (Kostyantyn Hryshenko*);
Main Committee II (safeguards and nuclear free zones): Chair Andre Erdos of Hungary; Vice Chairs: Enrique de la Torre of Argentina and NAM nominee (not yet confirmed);
Main Committee III (peaceful uses): Chair Jaap Ramaker of Netherlands; Vice Chairs from Bulgaria and NAM (to be confirmed);
Drafting Committee: Chair Tadeusz Strulak of Poland; Vice Chairs Pasi Patokallio of Finland, representative of NAM;
Credentials Committee: Andelfo Garcia of Colombia; Vice Chairs Alyaksandr Sychou of Belarus and Mary Elizabeth Hoinkes of USA
 

SPEECHES

On taking the Chair, Dhanapala read a statement from Sri Lankan President Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga which affirmed the importance of the NPT and criticised the doctrine of nuclear deterrence. Emphasising that 'the ideal final outcome' would be a consensus, Dhanapala called on the states to harmonise their differences and be prepared to consult and compromise as well as discuss and debate. He referred to all the objectives of the NPT but with heaviest emphasis on nuclear disarmament, linking the necessity to outlaw nuclear weapons with recent agreements outlawing chemical and biological weapons, arguing that 'The INF Treaty, START I and START II are important milestones in a journey that must end with total nuclear disarmament.'

In his short welcome speech, Christopher referred to the history and aims of the NPT and averred: 'the NPT has worked.' He reiterated that 'the nuclear weapon states have committed themselves to pursue negotiations for nuclear disarmament, which remains our ultimate goal' and concluded 'For all nations and all peoples, the future of the NPT will be even more important than its past.' The three group leaders made short speeches acknowledging the work of the PrepComs and various officers. Blix gave a long speech on the role of the IAEA, development of safeguards, learning from the situations in Iraq and North Korea, and the need for more resources and access to be able to confirm the absence of clandestine activities. In an attempt to de-emphasize the role of nuclear power in its activities, Blix also referred to its research and projects in water purification, medical and food irradiation techniques. Boutros Ghali welcomed the accession of 178 states to the NPT, the objectives of which he characterised as i) to enhance security for non-nuclear-weapon states; ii) to advance nuclear disarmament; iii) to provide access to nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. He welcomed progress on reducing nuclear arsenals and urged an early conclusion of a CTBT. Arguing that the 'most safe, sure and swift way to deal with the threat of nuclear arms is to do away with them in every regard', Boutros Ghali closed with the rallying cry: 'No more testing. No more production. No more sales or transfers.' He concluded '[R]eduction and destruction of all nuclear weapons and the means to make them should be humanity's great common cause.'

Author's note: The names are the nearest approximation I could get in the difficult hearing conditions of the observers' gallery, and I will confirm as soon as I can.

This update was written by Rebecca Johnson.


Back to 1995 NPT RevCon