British American Security Information Council: Transatlantic Strategies For A More Secure World

*
*
Press Room
Email Updates
Publications
Getting to Zero
Nuclear Weapons
Transatlantic Security
Downloads & Links
BASIC Blogs
*
Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

Transatlantic Security

Back to the main page on Transatlantic Security

NATO

US Senate's NATO Mandates Spurned
by White House

Administration Fails to Act Upon Key Treaty Provisions

8 March 1999

By Thomas Neve

Last May President Clinton, upon receiving the advice and consent of the US Senate, signed the NATO Enlargement Treaty thereby allowing three former Warsaw Pact states, Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic, admission into the exclusive military alliance. On March 12, at a signing ceremony to be held in Independence, Missouri, the three will officially accede to NATO. However, the Treaty lays out specific time sensitive conditions to be satisfied by the Administration as a precursor to enlargement that have not been heeded. The three tasks concern transparency between the Administration and Congress calling for the following:

  • Not later than Oct. 30, 1998: A report to Congress on updated military requirements; analysis on all potential conventional, nuclear, chemical and biological threats to NATO until 2010.
  • Not later than March 30, 1999: Brief Congress at least twice on how an updated NATO will serve the US security interest; a timetable of new force goals by all members; revised nuclear policy.
  • Not later than April 1, 1999: Brief Congress on updated costs and individual budgets; updated proportional costs and cost-sharing arrangements; defence budgets of each member; any additional costs to US due to expansion; future membership expansion.

The lack of action on behalf of the Administration has meant that Senators have not been given the opportunity to monitor the progress of the new members. The Senate has not been able to ascertain whether the minimum political and military standards that they agreed and voted upon have been met.

Following is the text from the NATO Enlargement Ratification treaty signed by the Senate and President Clinton. It mentions specific tasks to be completed by specific dates. The Administration has not met these targets.



RESOLUTION OF RATIFICATION TO THE PROTOCOLS TO THE NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY OF 1949 ON THE ACCESSION OF POLAND, HUNGARY, AND THE CZECH REPUBLIC

U.S. SENATE

April 30, 1998

Resolution Text:

Sec. 3. Conditions.

Chapter (1) The Strategic Concept of NATO

Sub-section (D)

Report: Not later than 180 days after the date of adoption of this resolution, the President shall submit to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives a report on the Strategic Concept of NATO. The report shall be submitted in both classified and unclassified form and shall include

  • an explanation of the manner in which the Strategic Concept of NATO affects United States military requirements both within and outside the North Atlantic area, including the broader strategic rational of NATO;
  • an analysis of all potential threats to the North Atlantic area (meaning the entire territory if all NATO members) up to the year 2010, including the consideration of a reconstituted conventional threat to Europe, emerging capabilities of non-NATO countries to use nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons affecting the North Atlantic area, and the emerging ballistic missile and cruise missile threat affecting the North Atlantic area;
  • the identification of alternative system architectures for the deployment of a NATO missile defence for the entire territory of all NATO members that would be capable of countering the threat posed by emerging ballistic and cruise missile systems in countries other than declared nuclear powers, as well as in countries that are existing nuclear powers, together with timetables for development and an estimate of costs;
  • a detailed assessment of the progress of all NATO members, on a country-by-country basis, toward meeting current force goals; and
  • a general description of the overall approach to updating the Strategic Concept of NATO.


Sub-section (E)

Briefings on revisions to the strategic concept: Not less than twice in the 300-day period following the date of adoption of this resolution, each at an agreed time to precede each Ministerial meeting of the North Atlantic Council, the Senate expects the appropriate officials of the executive branch of Government to offer detailed briefings to the appropriate congressional committees on proposed changes to the Strategic Concept of NATO, including -

  • an explanation of the manner in which specific revisions to the Strategic Concept of NATO will serve United States national security interests and affect united States military requirements both within and outside the North Atlantic area;
  • a timetable for implementation of new force goals by all NATO members under any revised Strategic Concept of NATO;
  • a description of any negotiations regarding the revision of the nuclear weapons policy of NATO; and
  • a description of any proposal to condition decisions of the North Atlantic Council upon the approval of the United Nations, the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe, or any NATO-affiliated forum.


Chapter (2) Costs, benefits, burdensharing, and military implications of the enlargement of NATO. -


Sub-section (B)

Annual reports. - Not later than April 1 of each year during the five-year period following the date of entry into force of the Protocols to the North Atlantic Treaty of 1949 on the Accession of Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic, the President shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report, which may be submitted in an unclassified and classified form, and which shall contain the following information:

  • The amount contributed to the common budgets of NATO by each NATO member during the preceding calendar year.
  • The proportional share assigned to, and paid by, each NATO member under NATO's cost-sharing arrangements.
  • The national defence budget of each NATO member, the steps taken by each NATO member to meet NATO force goals, and the adequacy of the national defence budget of each NATO member in meeting common defence and security obligations.
  • Any costs incurred by the United States in connection with the membership of Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic in NATO, including the deployment of United States military personnel, the provision of any defence article or defence service, the funding of any training activity, or the modification or construction of any military facility.
  • The status of discussions concerning NATO membership for countries participating in the Partnership for Peace.


Chapter (4) Report on intelligence matters:


Sub-section (A)

Progress report. - Not later than January 1, 1999, the President shall submit a report to the congressional intelligence committees on the progress of Hungary, Poland and the Czech Republic in satisfying the security requirements for membership of NATO.


Sub-section (B)

Reports regarding protection of the intelligence and methods. - Not later than January 1, 1999, and again not later than the date that is 90 days after the date of accession to the North Atlantic treaty by Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic, the Director of Central Intelligence shall submit a detailed report to the congressional intelligence committees -

  • identifying the latest procedures and requirements established by Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic for the protection of intelligence sources and methods; and
  • including an assessment of how the overall procedures and requirements of Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic for the protection of intelligence sources and methods compare with the procedures and requirements of other NATO members for the protection of intelligence sources and methods.



President Clinton - March 20, 1998, The White House:

"I have consulted broadly with Congress on decisions about the admissions of the first three members. I pledge to do the same before any future decisions are made. And of course any new members would also require the advice and the consent of the United States Senate."

"We must continue to strengthen the partnership for peace with our many friends in Europe. We need to give even more practical expression to the agreements between NATO and Russia, and NATO and Ukraine, turning words into deeds. With Russia and other countries, we must continue to reduce our nuclear stockpiles -- and we thank you, Senator Lugar, for your leadership on that -- to combat the dangers of proliferation, to lower conventional arms ceilings all across Europe."


President Clinton NATO Enlargement Ratification ceremony May 21, 1998 The White House:

"And just very briefly before I close, let me mention the things that I believe we still have to do with NATO. We have to build closer ties with the Partnership for Peace members. We have to reinforce the practical cooperation between NATO and Russia and between NATO and Ukraine. We have to see through on our efforts to secure a lasting peace in the Balkans, and we cannot walk away until the job is done. We must achieve deeper reductions in our nuclear forces and lower the limits on conventional arms across the European continent."

Back to Summit Updates

Back to Trans-atlantic Security Home Page

 

*
BASIC UK: The Grayston Centre, 2nd Fl, 28 Charles Square, London N1 6HT, +44-(0)20-7324 4680
BASIC US: 110 Maryland Ave NE, Suite 205, Washington, DC 20002, +1 202 546 8055