British American Security Information Council: Transatlantic Strategies For A More Secure World

*
*
Press Room
Email Updates
Publications
Getting to Zero
Nuclear Weapons
Transatlantic Security
Downloads & Links
BASIC Blogs
*
Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

Transatlantic Security

Back to the main page on Transatlantic Security

NATO

Continents of Kosovos Await British Forces in US Vision for NATO Strategy

8 March 1999

NATO has proved unable to end the Balkan wars that have been spreading South since 1990. In November 1991, while Dubrovnik was being shelled by the Yugoslav army, NATO agreed its present strategy in Rome with the promise of extending stability in Europe.

Eight years after the Rome summit, the Balkan wars continue. According to BASIC's research the new NATO strategy review so far contains no new crisis management initiatives or any proposals for reducing armaments in Europe, be they nuclear, heavy weapons or small arms. NATO last updated its arms control concept in 1989.

The major issues in the strategy review concern when to bring new states into NATO and how to manage military intervention. Little attention is being paid to managing conflicts in order to provide exit strategies for troops deployed in peace-support missions. BASIC recommends a comprehensive policy agenda in its new report "A Risk Reduction Strategy for NATO: Preparing for the Next Fifty Years".

While London hosts ceremonies for the 50th anniversary of NATO, British and other European forces are poised to be deployed in Kosovo. European leaders hail the ability of European forces to act independently of the US.

At the NATO Summit in Washington DC on 23-25 April, Alliance leaders are likely to endorse plans to expand NATOs commitments. The US Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright, described her vision of NATOs future as "a force of peace from the Middle East to Central Africa". Other NATO states are pushing for Alliance membership for other Eastern European nations.

With the US continuing to press for a global role for NATO there is widespread concern in European capitals that Europeans should not have been so quick to commit so many forces without a similar commitment from the US.

NATO enlargement only increases the concern that if new members seek military help, the US will again require Europeans to shoulder all or most of the burden. Europeans are unaware that isolationist Senators in the US have already obtained a pledge from the administration that Article V tasks will be treated on a case-by-case basis (document available on request). In these circumstances the most loyal allies of the US will feel the need to provide forces first to help NATO solidarity, and these forces will tend to be British.

"The extension of Allied commitments without proper consideration of its implications for British forces is short-sighted to say the least", says Daniel Plesch, director of BASIC.

Back to Summit Updates

Back to Trans-atlantic Security Home Page

 

*
BASIC UK: The Grayston Centre, 2nd Fl, 28 Charles Square, London N1 6HT, +44-(0)20-7324 4680
BASIC US: 110 Maryland Ave NE, Suite 205, Washington, DC 20002, +1 202 546 8055