British American Security Information Council: Transatlantic Strategies For A More Secure World

*
*
Press Room
Email Updates
Publications
Getting to Zero
Nuclear Weapons
Transatlantic Security
Downloads & Links
BASIC Blogs
*
Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

Transatlantic Security

Back to the main page on Transatlantic Security

NATO

Canada Urges NATO Nuclear Strategy Update for Washington Summit

20 April 1999

In response to a report from its parliament, the Canadian government has agreed that NATO, in its examination of the Alliance's Strategic Concept, should include the nuclear component. An extract is below.

Details
On 10 December 1998, the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade (SCFAIT) submitted a report to the Canadian House of Commons entitled Canada and the Nuclear Challenge: Reducing the Political Value of Nuclear Weapons for the 21st Century.

On 19 April 1999, the goverment produced a formal response. In reply to one of the report's recommendations, the Canadian government agreed that Canada should urge NATO to update the nuclear paragraphs of the Alliance's Strategic Concept, scheduled to be released at the 50th Anniversary Summit in Washington. The following is an excerpt from the Canadian Government response:

UPDATING THE STRATEGIC CONCEPT

15. The Committee recommends that the Government of Canada argue forcefully within NATO that the present re-examination and update as necessary of the Alliance Strategic Concept should include its nuclear component.

Response
The Government agrees. Current NATO nuclear policy is set out in the 1991 Strategic Concept. The Concept, drafted in the immediate aftermath of the Cold War, was positive and progressive for its time, but the profound transformation of the security environment in the intervening years led to a decision at the 1997 Madrid Summit to re-examine it. The updated version is expected to be released at the Alliance's 50th Anniversary Summit in Washington, DC in April.

Canada argued that for the revision to be credible, it must deal with an examination of the characteristics of NATO nuclear forces. Developments with respect to various arms control and disarmament arrangements have enhanced overall Alliance security. Circumstances are much changed since 1991. For example, the Alliance has reduced by more than eighty percent its sub-strategic nuclear forces, eliminated all nuclear artillery and short-range ground-launched missiles and reiterated that it has no intention, no plan and no reason to deploy nuclear weapons on the territory of new Alliance members. As well, remaining Alliance nuclear forces operate at significantly reduced levels of readiness. In addition, the CFE Treaty has reduced the levels and relative balance of conventional forces in Europe. NATO has sufficient conventional forces to withstand any conventional challenge by any imaginable single or combined adversary. Other developments, including the establishment by NATO of cooperative security bodies such as the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council and the inauguration of a new partnership with Russia and other states, as well as the new roles adopted by NATO and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) in conflict prevention, crisis management and peace support operations, have significantly improved NATO's ability to prevent conflict and manage crises through political means.

As a result, NATO is better placed to defuse crises through diplomatic or other means or, should it be necessary, to mount a successful conventional defence. Consequently, the circumstances in which any use of nuclear weapons might have to be contemplated by the Alliance are now extremely remote and ever more difficult to envisage.

Through arms control measures and by demonstrating their NPT commitments to the implementation of nuclear disarmament, NATO members should seek to enhance security and stability further at the lowest level of forces consistent with defence. The Alliance is an important forum and centre for coordinating practical work on future non-proliferation, arms control and disarmament. Canada will urge Allies to pursue consistently this objective which is a vital aspect of their efforts to provide for their security and defence.

Canada has proposed that the Alliance agree at the Washington Summit that NATO review its nuclear policy and its relationship to proliferation, arms control and disarmament developments. This review and complementary activities by the Alliance would send an important signal to would-be proliferators that both nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation are issues the Alliance takes seriously. Taking into account that NATO works on the basis of consensus, Canada will continue to urge NATO partners to consider the impact on potential nuclear proliferators when considering the characterization of the purpose of NATO nuclear forces.

The full text of the response
Government Response to the Recommendations of the Standing Committeed on Foreign and International Trade on Canada's Nuclear Disarmament and NTitreon-Proliferation Policy

Back to Summit Updates

Back to Trans-atlantic Security Home Page

 

*
BASIC UK: The Grayston Centre, 2nd Fl, 28 Charles Square, London N1 6HT, +44-(0)20-7324 4680
BASIC US: 110 Maryland Ave NE, Suite 205, Washington, DC 20002, +1 202 546 8055